The Mysterious Omnibus Date

brandonmurphy • Nov 25, 2015

Defendants in criminal matters are frequently confused by the “omnibus date” that the Court sets. Pursuant to statute, the omnibus date “shall” be set by the Court during the initial hearing, and the omnibus date is to be between 45 and 75 days after the initial hearing. See I.C. 35-36-8-1.

deadline

Omnibus Deadlines

So what is the omnibus date? According to attorney Brandon E. Murphy of the firm of Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC. the omnibus date is a “technical motions and notice deadline.” It is important, he says, in several respects. First, if the Defendant wishes to file a Motion to Dismiss the charges, a Motion to Dismiss generally must be filed twenty (20) days before the omnibus date in a felony case, or fifteen (15) days before the omnibus date in a misdemeanor case. See I.C. 35-34-1-4. Secondly, some defenses require the Defendant give notice of their intended defense at or before the omnibus date. Two notable defenses that require this pre-trial notice are the defenses of alibi and insanity. See I.C. 35-36-4-1, 35-36-2-1. Finally, some courts may tie various other deadlines to the omnibus date, such as for the filing of evidentiary motions, including Motions to Suppress Evidence.

Given the circumstances of the case at hand, it may be critical for a defendant to be able to preserve certain issues by making a timely motion or giving timely notice of a defense. The best way to ensure that these deadlines are met is by retaining counsel before or shortly after the initial hearing so that your counsel can evaluate your case and determine what must be done and when.

Be sure to listen carefully to the Judge at your initial hearing if you are unrepresented. The Judge will inform you of the dates you are required to attend. It is likely that the Judge will not require you to appear on your omnibus date unless the Judge also sets a pre-trial conference or some other hearing for the same date. In Muncie and Delaware County Courts, it is Mr. Murphy’s experience that Defendants typically are not ordered to appear on their omnibus date.

Shifting Blame for Overdose Deaths: The Crime of Dealing Resulting in Death

By Brandon Murphy • 09 Mar, 2023
Prosecutors are too eager to use Indiana's recent and severe Dealing Resulting in Death statute.

Navigating Law Enforcement Interrogation: Deceptive Tactics and Your Rights Against Self-Incrimination

31 Aug, 2022
Navigating Law Enforcement Interrogation

Murphy Again Named to Rising Stars List

By brandonmurphy • 10 Mar, 2019
Managing Attorney Brandon Murphy was again named to the Super Lawyers’ Rising Star list in the Criminal Defense practice area. To be eligible to be a Rising Star, a candidate must be forty (40) years of age or younger or have fewer than ten (10) years experience in the practice of law. No more than [..] The post Murphy Again Named to Rising Stars List appeared first on Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC.

Murphy Named Rising Star by Super Lawyers

By brandonmurphy • 27 Feb, 2018
Managing Attorney Brandon E. Murphy was named as a Rising Star in Criminal Defense in the 2018 publication of Indiana Super Lawyers. To be eligible to be a Rising Star, a candidate must be forty (40) years of age or younger or have fewer than ten (10) years experience in the practice of law. No [..] The post Murphy Named Rising Star by Super Lawyers appeared first on Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC.

The Corpus Delicti Rule

By brandonmurphy • 17 Feb, 2017
A recent Court of Appeals decision, Shinnock v. State, 18A05-1606-CR-1258 (opinion can be found here: http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/02091701jts.pdf), highlights the little-known Corpus Delicti Rule in the course of some very unfortunate facts. This case was tried in the Delaware County Circuit Court No. 2. It should be noted that this opinion is still subject to appeal by [..] The post The Corpus Delicti Rule appeared first on Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC.

Court of Appeals Panel Split on Intimidation Charge

By brandonmurphy • 25 Apr, 2016
On April 21, 2016, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed Victor Roar’s conviction for intimidation in part because they “conclude[d] that the majority in [an earlier case] did not correctly decide that question.” Roar v. State, 49A02-1506-CR-506 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016). The case the Roar Court was criticizing was C.L. v. State, 2 N.E.3d 798 (Ind. Ct. [..] The post Court of Appeals Panel Split on Intimidation Charge appeared first on Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC.

The Limits of Indiana’s Misdemeanor Arrest Statute

By brandonmurphy • 23 Jan, 2016
Law enforcement always has authority to arrest when there is an arrest warrant for the person, and when the police have probable cause to believe the person has committed or attempted to commit a felony. However, there are limits to law enforcement’s power to arrest for a misdemeanor if they do not actually observe the [..] The post The Limits of Indiana’s Misdemeanor Arrest Statute appeared first on Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC.

Lessons for Defense Counsel from Making a Murderer

By brandonmurphy • 28 Dec, 2015
One of the most popular recent shows on NetFlix is a series entitled “Making a Murderer,” concerning the investigation and murder trials of Defendants Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey. The “hook” of the show is that Defendant Avery had previously been convicted, and later exonerated, of a brutal rape. Avery spent eighteen (18) years in [..] The post Lessons for Defense Counsel from Making a Murderer appeared first on Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC.

Cleaning Criminal Records

By brandonmurphy • 08 May, 2015
One of the most under-utilized services the attorneys at Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC. provide is the process of cleaning an individual’s criminal record. Under certain circumstances, eligible convictions or arrests can be ordered expunged (or removed) from a person’s criminal history. The Order of Expungement is sent to the Indiana State Central Repository, law [..] The post Cleaning Criminal Records appeared first on Cannon Bruns & Murphy, LLC.
Share by: